Post
36
✅ Article highlight: *Delegation and Consent in SI* (art-60-063, v0.1)
TL;DR:
This article makes delegation and consent into *first-class runtime objects*.
In SI, delegation is not a vague social gesture. It is an *effectful capability transfer* that must be bounded, signed, policy-bound, auditable, and revocable. And consent is not a formality: delegation is not complete until the delegate has accepted responsibility.
Read:
kanaria007/agi-structural-intelligence-protocols
Why it matters:
• turns “who was allowed to do this?” into a deterministic audit question
• shows why delegation must be enforced at commit time, not assumed from role names
• treats consent as part of the accountability chain, not a UX nicety
• makes revocation, attenuation, and replay safety part of the runtime contract
What’s inside:
• *Delegation Token (DT)* as a bounded, signed capability transfer
• *Consent Record (CR)* as explicit acceptance of responsibility
• *Revocation Record (RR)* as a first-class validity change
• commit-time checks for signature, expiry, parent binding, consent, policy, revocation, budgets, and rollback floor
• delegation chains for human → AI → AI systems under L3 conditions
Key idea:
In governed systems, “delegation” is not complete when authority is granted.
It is complete only when the system can later prove:
*who delegated what to whom, under which policy, with what acceptance, and whether it was still valid at commit time.*
TL;DR:
This article makes delegation and consent into *first-class runtime objects*.
In SI, delegation is not a vague social gesture. It is an *effectful capability transfer* that must be bounded, signed, policy-bound, auditable, and revocable. And consent is not a formality: delegation is not complete until the delegate has accepted responsibility.
Read:
kanaria007/agi-structural-intelligence-protocols
Why it matters:
• turns “who was allowed to do this?” into a deterministic audit question
• shows why delegation must be enforced at commit time, not assumed from role names
• treats consent as part of the accountability chain, not a UX nicety
• makes revocation, attenuation, and replay safety part of the runtime contract
What’s inside:
• *Delegation Token (DT)* as a bounded, signed capability transfer
• *Consent Record (CR)* as explicit acceptance of responsibility
• *Revocation Record (RR)* as a first-class validity change
• commit-time checks for signature, expiry, parent binding, consent, policy, revocation, budgets, and rollback floor
• delegation chains for human → AI → AI systems under L3 conditions
Key idea:
In governed systems, “delegation” is not complete when authority is granted.
It is complete only when the system can later prove:
*who delegated what to whom, under which policy, with what acceptance, and whether it was still valid at commit time.*