| --- |
| language: |
| - en |
| task_categories: |
| - question-answering |
| - summarization |
| - text-generation |
| task_ids: |
| - multiple-choice-qa |
| - natural-language-inference |
| paperswithcode_id: scrolls |
| configs: |
| - gov_report |
| - summ_screen_fd |
| - qmsum |
| - qasper |
| - narrative_qa |
| - quality |
| - contract_nli |
| tags: |
| - query-based-summarization |
| - long-texts |
| --- |
| |
| ## Dataset Description |
|
|
| - **Homepage:** [SCROLLS](https://www.scrolls-benchmark.com/) |
| - **Repository:** [SCROLLS Github repository](https://github.com/tau-nlp/scrolls) |
| - **Paper:** [SCROLLS: Standardized CompaRison Over Long Language Sequences |
| ](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.03533.pdf) |
| - **Leaderboard:** [Leaderboard](https://www.scrolls-benchmark.com/leaderboard) |
| - **Point of Contact:** [scrolls-benchmark-contact@googlegroups.com](scrolls-benchmark-contact@googlegroups.com) |
|
|
| # Dataset Card for SCROLLS |
|
|
| ## Overview |
| SCROLLS is a suite of datasets that require synthesizing information over long texts. The benchmark includes seven natural language tasks across multiple domains, including summarization, question answering, and natural language inference. |
|
|
| ## Leaderboard |
| The SCROLLS benchmark leaderboard can be found [here](https://www.scrolls-benchmark.com/leaderboard). |
|
|
| ## Tasks |
| SCROLLS comprises the following tasks: |
|
|
| #### GovReport ([Huang et al., 2021](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.02112.pdf)) |
| GovReport is a summarization dataset of reports addressing various national policy issues published by the |
| Congressional Research Service and the U.S. Government Accountability Office, where each document is paired with a hand-written executive summary. |
| The reports and their summaries are longer than their equivalents in other popular long-document summarization datasets; |
| for example, GovReport's documents are approximately 1.5 and 2.5 times longer than the documents in Arxiv and PubMed, respectively. |
|
|
| #### SummScreenFD ([Chen et al., 2021](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.07091.pdf)) |
| SummScreenFD is a summarization dataset in the domain of TV shows (e.g. Friends, Game of Thrones). |
| Given a transcript of a specific episode, the goal is to produce the episode's recap. |
| The original dataset is divided into two complementary subsets, based on the source of its community contributed transcripts. |
| For SCROLLS, we use the ForeverDreaming (FD) subset, as it incorporates 88 different shows, |
| making it a more diverse alternative to the TV MegaSite (TMS) subset, which has only 10 shows. |
| Community-authored recaps for the ForeverDreaming transcripts were collected from English Wikipedia and TVMaze. |
|
|
| #### QMSum ([Zhong et al., 2021](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.05938.pdf)) |
| QMSum is a query-based summarization dataset, consisting of 232 meetings transcripts from multiple domains. |
| The corpus covers academic group meetings at the International Computer Science Institute and their summaries, industrial product meetings for designing a remote control, |
| and committee meetings of the Welsh and Canadian Parliaments, dealing with a variety of public policy issues. |
| Annotators were tasked with writing queries about the broad contents of the meetings, as well as specific questions about certain topics or decisions, |
| while ensuring that the relevant text for answering each query spans at least 200 words or 10 turns. |
|
|
| #### NarrativeQA ([Kočiský et al., 2018](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.07040.pdf)) |
| NarrativeQA (Kočiský et al., 2021) is an established question answering dataset over entire books from Project Gutenberg and movie scripts from different websites. |
| Annotators were given summaries of the books and scripts obtained from Wikipedia, and asked to generate question-answer pairs, |
| resulting in about 30 questions and answers for each of the 1,567 books and scripts. |
| They were encouraged to use their own words rather then copying, and avoid asking yes/no questions or ones about the cast. |
| Each question was then answered by an additional annotator, providing each question with two reference answers (unless both answers are identical). |
|
|
| #### Qasper ([Dasigi et al., 2021](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.03011.pdf)) |
| Qasper is a question answering dataset over NLP papers filtered from the Semantic Scholar Open Research Corpus (S2ORC). |
| Questions were written by NLP practitioners after reading only the title and abstract of the papers, |
| while another set of NLP practitioners annotated the answers given the entire document. |
| Qasper contains abstractive, extractive, and yes/no questions, as well as unanswerable ones. |
|
|
| #### QuALITY ([Pang et al., 2021](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.08608.pdf)) |
| QuALITY is a multiple-choice question answering dataset over articles and stories sourced from Project Gutenberg, |
| the Open American National Corpus, and more. |
| Experienced writers wrote questions and distractors, and were incentivized to write answerable, unambiguous questions such that in order to correctly answer them, |
| human annotators must read large portions of the given document. |
| Reference answers were then calculated using the majority vote between of the annotators and writer's answers. |
| To measure the difficulty of their questions, Pang et al. conducted a speed validation process, |
| where another set of annotators were asked to answer questions given only a short period of time to skim through the document. |
| As a result, 50% of the questions in QuALITY are labeled as hard, i.e. the majority of the annotators in the speed validation setting chose the wrong answer. |
|
|
| #### ContractNLI ([Koreeda and Manning, 2021](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.01799.pdf)) |
| Contract NLI is a natural language inference dataset in the legal domain. |
| Given a non-disclosure agreement (the premise), the task is to predict whether a particular legal statement (the hypothesis) is entailed, not entailed (neutral), or cannot be entailed (contradiction) from the contract. |
| The NDAs were manually picked after simple filtering from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (EDGAR) and Google. |
| The dataset contains a total of 607 contracts and 17 unique hypotheses, which were combined to produce the dataset's 10,319 examples. |
|
|
| ## Data Fields |
|
|
| All the datasets in the benchmark are in the same input-output format |
|
|
| - `input`: a `string` feature. The input document. |
| - `output`: a `string` feature. The target. |
| - `id`: a `string` feature. Unique per input. |
| - `pid`: a `string` feature. Unique per input-output pair (can differ from 'id' in NarrativeQA and Qasper, where there is more then one valid target). |
|
|
| ## Citation |
| If you use the SCROLLS data, **please make sure to cite all of the original dataset papers.** [[bibtex](https://scrolls-tau.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/scrolls_datasets.bib)] |
| ``` |
| @inproceedings{shaham-etal-2022-scrolls, |
| title = "{SCROLLS}: Standardized {C}ompa{R}ison Over Long Language Sequences", |
| author = "Shaham, Uri and |
| Segal, Elad and |
| Ivgi, Maor and |
| Efrat, Avia and |
| Yoran, Ori and |
| Haviv, Adi and |
| Gupta, Ankit and |
| Xiong, Wenhan and |
| Geva, Mor and |
| Berant, Jonathan and |
| Levy, Omer", |
| booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing", |
| month = dec, |
| year = "2022", |
| address = "Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates", |
| publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics", |
| url = "https://aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-main.823", |
| pages = "12007--12021", |
| } |
| ``` |