Meaning of the reasoning tokens

#2
by pdelobelle - opened

Thanks for the nice model release! The special reasoning tokens seem really interesting. Finally something better than "Wait, ...".

I was looking into the use of these reasoning tokens and I think most are strait-forward, except the ⟨Hβ‰ˆX.X⟩ and β†Ί. So I wanted to check what the intended meaning was. Sadly this was undocumented in the readme.

This is what I figured out:

Token Function Example from traces
β†’ Logical implication or derivation step "Concert halls grew larger β†’ Original instruments couldn't compete"
β†Ί Iterative refinement? "Back to specifics β†Ί:" ; "further undermines trust β†’ β†Ί"
β€» Critical insights or questions "β€» Key question: equitable tolling vs US immunity"
?maybe? Speculation? "Exception cases? ?maybe? Ion pairs in solution..."
● High confidence: well-established facts, strong empirical evidence "Hummingbird-Heliconia coevolution ● well-documented"
◐ Medium/partial confidence: incomplete knowledge, tentative claims "Information completeness: ◐ Missing: specific statistical data"
β—‹ Low confidence: weak knowledge, missing information, speculative claims "β—‹ Exact reasoning details: covered general framework"
⚠ Identifies biases, problematic assumptions, ambiguities "Response assumes long jump. ⚠ Domain specificity issue."
☐ Unverified hypothesis or pending verification step "☐ β†’ β˜‘ 'Whorfianism of the third kind'" (before verification)
β˜‘ Verified claim or completed verification step "☐ β†’ β˜‘ Strong theoretical grounding in linguistic relativity"
βœ“ Validation, confirmation "Logical consistency check: βœ“ Multiple independent factors converge"
∴ Therefore "∴ Simple factual verification with supporting context."
⟨Hβ‰ˆX.X⟩ Hallucination? Or hypothesis strength? (0.1-1.8) "⟨Hβ‰ˆ0.8⟩ Island biogeography principles... empty niches..."
PleIAs org

Thanks for opening this. Readme now integrates a presentation of special reasoning tokens.

Pclanglais changed discussion status to closed

Sign up or log in to comment