stduhpf commited on
Commit
77ab62e
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 837c8ec

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +7 -5
README.md CHANGED
@@ -13,11 +13,13 @@ The official QAT weights released by google use fp16 (instead of Q6_K) for the e
13
 
14
  Here are some perplexity measurements:
15
 
16
- | Model | File size ↓ | PPL (wiki.text.raw) ↓ |
17
  | --- | --- | --- |
18
- | [This model](https://huggingface.co/stduhpf/google-gemma-3-4b-it-qat-q4_0-gguf-small/blob/main/gemma-3-4b-it-q4_0_s.gguf) | 2.36 GB | 14.5943 +/- 0.13405 |
19
- | [Q4_0 (bartowski)](https://huggingface.co/bartowski/google_gemma-3-1b-it-GGUF/blob/main/google_gemma-3-4b-it-Q4_0.gguf) | 2.37 GB | 16.8002 +/- 0.16519 |
20
- | [QAT Q4_0 (google)](https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-q4_0-gguf/blob/main/gemma-3-4b-it-q4_0.gguf) | 3.16 GB | 14.5796 +/- 0.13395 |
21
 
22
  Note that this model ends up smaller than the Q4_0 from Bartowski. This is because llama.cpp sets some tensors to Q4_1 when quantizing models to Q4_0 with imatrix, but this is a static quant.
23
- The perplexity scores are within margin of error between this model and the original QAT, despite the size difference.
 
 
 
13
 
14
  Here are some perplexity measurements:
15
 
16
+ | Model | File size ↓ | PPL (wiki.text.raw) ↓ | Hellaswag (first 4000 tasks, deterministic) ↑ |
17
  | --- | --- | --- |
18
+ | [This model](https://huggingface.co/stduhpf/google-gemma-3-4b-it-qat-q4_0-gguf-small/blob/main/gemma-3-4b-it-q4_0_s.gguf) | 2.36 GB | 14.5943 +/- 0.13405 | 65.675% |
19
+ | [Q4_0 (bartowski)](https://huggingface.co/bartowski/google_gemma-3-1b-it-GGUF/blob/main/google_gemma-3-4b-it-Q4_0.gguf) | 2.37 GB | 16.8002 +/- 0.16519 | 65.65% |
20
+ | [QAT Q4_0 (google)](https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-q4_0-gguf/blob/main/gemma-3-4b-it-q4_0.gguf) | 3.16 GB | 14.5796 +/- 0.13395 | 66.075% |
21
 
22
  Note that this model ends up smaller than the Q4_0 from Bartowski. This is because llama.cpp sets some tensors to Q4_1 when quantizing models to Q4_0 with imatrix, but this is a static quant.
23
+ The perplexity scores are within margin of error between this model and the original QAT, despite the size difference.
24
+
25
+ The drop in Hellaswag score is a bit surprising and disapointing for me. I really was expecting this model do perform almost identical to the original, but it seems ther are 16 tasks out of the 4000 tested that this model performs worse at.