# \-sk ssh keys not supported?

**URL:** </static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Ft%2Fsk-ssh-keys-not-supported%2F58218%3E%5C
**Category:** 🤗Hub\
**Created:** [October 11, 2023, 8:25pm UTC](/static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Ft%2Fsk-ssh-keys-not-supported%2F58218 "2023-10-11T20:25:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xaiki](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/838e76/32.png) [@xaiki](/static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Fu%2Fxaiki)%5C
**Post date:** [October 11, 2023, 8:25pm UTC](/static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Ft%2Fsk-ssh-keys-not-supported%2F58218%2F1 "2023-10-11T20:25:23Z")

</div>

I’ve been trying to upload a ed25519-sk (security key) key to HF without luck, the non -sk variant built on the same machine worked fine. any reason why those variants are rejected ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pierric](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/hellohellohello/user_avatar/discuss.huggingface.co/pierric/32/50750_2.png) [@pierric](/static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Fu%2Fpierric)%5C
**Post date:** [October 11, 2023, 11:34pm UTC](/static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Ft%2Fsk-ssh-keys-not-supported%2F58218%2F2 "2023-10-11T23:34:26Z")

</div>

Hi @xaiki, sorry for the inconvenience; unfortunately we don’t support this format of security key as of now (the library we’re using to handle SSH keys hasn’t added support yet).