# Should fine-tuning alway be 'Supervised Fine-tuning'

**URL:** </static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Ft%2Fshould-fine-tuning-alway-be-supervised-fine-tuning%2F61857%3E%5C
**Category:** Beginners\
**Created:** [November 10, 2023, 8:27pm UTC](/static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Ft%2Fshould-fine-tuning-alway-be-supervised-fine-tuning%2F61857 "2023-11-10T20:27:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![316usman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/3/9d8465/32.png) [@316usman](/static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Fu%2F316usman)%5C
**Post date:** [November 10, 2023, 8:27pm UTC](/static-proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.huggingface.co%2Ft%2Fshould-fine-tuning-alway-be-supervised-fine-tuning%2F61857%2F1 "2023-11-10T20:27:54Z")

</div>

I am in the process of fine-tuning an open-source model, because I am doing a ‘FULL FINE-TUNING’ rather than LoRA or QLoRA is it necessary to break down all my text into a Q/A format for this type of fine-tuning or the model would learn my data after its weights have been updated by by data?

Please help.