Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,160 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
license: mit
|
| 3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: mit
|
| 3 |
+
datasets:
|
| 4 |
+
- glue
|
| 5 |
+
language:
|
| 6 |
+
- en
|
| 7 |
+
metrics:
|
| 8 |
+
- accuracy
|
| 9 |
+
- f1
|
| 10 |
+
- spearmanr
|
| 11 |
+
- pearsonr
|
| 12 |
+
- matthews_correlation
|
| 13 |
+
base_model: google-bert/bert-base-uncased
|
| 14 |
+
pipeline_tag: text-classification
|
| 15 |
+
tags:
|
| 16 |
+
- adapter
|
| 17 |
+
- low-rank
|
| 18 |
+
- fine-tuning
|
| 19 |
+
- LoRA
|
| 20 |
+
- DiffLoRA
|
| 21 |
+
eval_results: "Refer to GLUE experiments in the examples folder"
|
| 22 |
+
view_doc: "https://huggingface.co/nozomuteruyo14/Diff_LoRA"
|
| 23 |
+
---
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
# Model Card for DiffLoRA
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
<!-- Provide a quick summary of what the model is/does. -->
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
DiffLoRA is an innovative adapter architecture that extends conventional low-rank adaptation (LoRA) by fine-tuning a pre-trained large-scale model using differential low-rank matrices. Instead of updating all model parameters, DiffLoRA updates only a small set of low-rank matrices, which allows for efficient fine-tuning with reduced trainable parameters.
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
## Model Details
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
### Model Description
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
DiffLoRA is an original method developed by the author and is inspired by the conceptual ideas from the Differential Transformer paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.05258). It decomposes the weight update into two components—positive and negative contributions—enabling a more fine-grained adjustment than traditional LoRA. The output of a single layer is computed as:
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
\[
|
| 38 |
+
y = W x + \Delta y
|
| 39 |
+
\]
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
where:
|
| 42 |
+
- \(x \in \mathbb{R}^{d_{in}}\) is the input vector (or each sample in a batch).
|
| 43 |
+
- \(W \in \mathbb{R}^{d_{out} \times d_{in}}\) is the fixed pre-trained weight matrix.
|
| 44 |
+
- \(\Delta y\) is the differential update computed as:
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
\[
|
| 47 |
+
\Delta y = \frac{\alpha}{r} \Big( x' A_{\text{pos}} B_{\text{pos}} - \tau \, x' A_{\text{neg}} B_{\text{neg}} \Big)
|
| 48 |
+
\]
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
with:
|
| 51 |
+
- \(x'\) being the input after dropout (or another regularization).
|
| 52 |
+
- \(A_{\text{pos}} \in \mathbb{R}^{d_{in} \times r}\) and \(B_{\text{pos}} \in \mathbb{R}^{r \times d_{out}}\) capturing the positive contribution.
|
| 53 |
+
- \(A_{\text{neg}} \in \mathbb{R}^{d_{in} \times r}\) and \(B_{\text{neg}} \in \mathbb{R}^{r \times d_{out}}\) capturing the negative contribution.
|
| 54 |
+
- \(\tau \in \mathbb{R}\) is a learnable scalar that balances the two contributions.
|
| 55 |
+
- \(\alpha\) is a scaling factor and \(r\) is the chosen rank.
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
For computational efficiency, the two low-rank components are fused via concatenation:
|
| 58 |
+
- \( \text{combined\_A} = \big[ A_{\text{pos}}, A_{\text{neg}} \big] \in \mathbb{R}^{d_{in} \times 2r} \)
|
| 59 |
+
- \( \text{combined\_B} = \begin{bmatrix} B_{\text{pos}} \\ -\tau \, B_{\text{neg}} \end{bmatrix} \in \mathbb{R}^{2r \times d_{out}} \)
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
The update is then calculated as:
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
\[
|
| 64 |
+
\text{update} = x' \cdot \text{combined\_A} \cdot \text{combined\_B}
|
| 65 |
+
\]
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
resulting in the final output:
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
\[
|
| 70 |
+
y = W x + \frac{\alpha}{r} \, \text{update}.
|
| 71 |
+
\]
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
- **Developed by:** Nozomu Fujisawa in Kondo Lab
|
| 74 |
+
- **Model type:** Differential Low-Rank Adapter (DiffLoRA)
|
| 75 |
+
- **Language(s) (NLP):** en
|
| 76 |
+
- **License:** MIT
|
| 77 |
+
- **Finetuned from model [optional]:** bert-base-uncased
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
### Model Sources [optional]
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
- **Repository:** [https://huggingface.co/nozomuteruyo14/Diff_LoRA](https://huggingface.co/nozomuteruyo14/Diff_LoRA)
|
| 82 |
+
- **Paper [optional]:** DiffLoRA is inspired by ideas from the Differential Transformer (https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.05258), but it is an original method developed by the author.
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
## Uses
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
### Direct Use
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
DiffLoRA is intended to be integrated as an adapter module into pre-trained transformer models. It allows efficient fine-tuning by updating only a small number of low-rank parameters, making it ideal for scenarios where computational resources are limited.
|
| 89 |
+
|
| 90 |
+
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
DiffLoRA is not designed for training models from scratch, nor is it recommended for tasks where full parameter updates are necessary. It is optimized for transformer-based NLP tasks and may not generalize well to non-NLP domains. Also, there are only a limited number of base models that can be used.
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
+
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
While DiffLoRA offers a parameter-efficient fine-tuning approach, it inherits limitations from its base models (e.g., BERT, MiniLM). It may not capture all domain-specific nuances when only a limited number of parameters are updated. Users should carefully evaluate performance and consider potential biases in their applications.
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
### Recommendations
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
Users should:
|
| 101 |
+
- Experiment with different rank \(r\) and scaling factor \(\alpha\) values.
|
| 102 |
+
- Compare DiffLoRA with other adapter techniques.
|
| 103 |
+
- Be cautious about over-relying on the adapter when full model adaptation might be necessary.
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
| 106 |
+
|
| 107 |
+
To integrate DiffLoRA into your fine-tuning workflow, check the example script in the `examples/run_glue_experiment.py` file.
|
| 108 |
+
|
| 109 |
+
## Training Details
|
| 110 |
+
|
| 111 |
+
### Training Data
|
| 112 |
+
|
| 113 |
+
This implementation has been demonstrated on GLUE tasks using the Hugging Face Datasets library.
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
### Training Procedure
|
| 116 |
+
|
| 117 |
+
DiffLoRA is applied by freezing the base model weights and updating only the low-rank adapter parameters. The procedure involves:
|
| 118 |
+
- Preprocessing text inputs (concatenating multiple text columns if necessary).
|
| 119 |
+
- Injecting DiffLoRA adapters into target linear layers.
|
| 120 |
+
- Fine-tuning on a downstream task while the base model remains frozen.
|
| 121 |
+
|
| 122 |
+
#### Training Hyperparameters
|
| 123 |
+
|
| 124 |
+
- **Training regime:** Fine-tuning with frozen base weights; only adapter parameters are updated.
|
| 125 |
+
- **Learning rate:** 2e-5 (example)
|
| 126 |
+
- **Batch size:** 32 per device
|
| 127 |
+
- **Epochs:** 3 (example)
|
| 128 |
+
- **Optimizer:** AdamW with weight decay
|
| 129 |
+
|
| 130 |
+
## Evaluation
|
| 131 |
+
|
| 132 |
+
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
| 133 |
+
|
| 134 |
+
#### Testing Data
|
| 135 |
+
|
| 136 |
+
GLUE validation sets are used for evaluation.
|
| 137 |
+
|
| 138 |
+
#### Factors
|
| 139 |
+
|
| 140 |
+
Evaluations are performed across multiple GLUE tasks to ensure comprehensive performance analysis.
|
| 141 |
+
|
| 142 |
+
#### Metrics
|
| 143 |
+
|
| 144 |
+
Evaluation metrics include accuracy, F1 score, Pearson correlation, and Spearman correlation, depending on the task.
|
| 145 |
+
|
| 146 |
+
### Results
|
| 147 |
+
|
| 148 |
+
For detailed evaluation results, please refer to the GLUE experiment script in the `examples` directory.
|
| 149 |
+
|
| 150 |
+
#### Summary
|
| 151 |
+
|
| 152 |
+
DiffLoRA achieves faster convergence and competitive performance on GLUE tasks compared to other parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods.
|
| 153 |
+
|
| 154 |
+
## Citation
|
| 155 |
+
|
| 156 |
+
paper: Writing
|
| 157 |
+
|
| 158 |
+
## Model Card Contact
|
| 159 |
+
|
| 160 |
+
For any questions regarding this model card, please contact: [[email protected]]
|